On this page: SAGE, the F-106 and
the MA-1 System
SAGE System Facts
SAGE Direction Center (DC) and Control Center (CC) Locations
Semi-Automatic Ground Environment - SAGE
 
SAGE
consoles and operators |
SAGE
Sector Control Room. The 'big screen' depicts the North American eastern coast
from the extreme west end of Nova Scotia (upper right) to Philadelphia (lower
left). Cape Cod is approximately centered with Long Island to its left, and two
"targets" are being tracked offshore
|
SAGE
Light Gun.
It could work directly on the scope or in the holes in the consoles
[MITRE Corporation] |
SAGE
Combat Center, Syracuse Air Force Station. Command post staff communicate with other SAGE sectors, monitor the air battle, and direct weapons [1959]. |
Control
room for the FSQ-7 computer equipped with separate consoles, standard IBM punched-card units
and magnetic tape units for each of the duplicate computers |
SAGE
Light Gun prototype [MITRE Corporation] |
By the time the SAGE system was fully deployed, it was obsolete, no match for
the speed of new ICBMs. SAGE was never designed to counter a space or
missile threat. It was designed to counter the air threat. SAGE was
operating long after the ICBM threat was recognized. Maybe it would have
been closed due to ICBMs had the Soviets gotten rid of its manned bomber force
and maintained only the Strategic Rocket Forces. SAGE was eventually
closed because the bomber threat diminished, thus the mission became airspace
sovereignty not defense. Some SAGE centers continued to operate until
1983, more than 20 years after its technology was obsolete and its mission
rendered militarily insignificant by the ICBM. As a final irony, in the
last years of its use, replacement vacuum tubes had to be purchased from
Soviet-bloc countries where they were still being widely manufactured.
Nevertheless, SAGE was extremely important and its many technical advances in
on-line systems, interactive and real-time computing including modems for
communication between sites over telephone lines, networking, light guns,
graphical displays, and reliable magnetic core memory. The technology led
to Sabre, the airline reservation system still in use today.
The SAGE
system and its development is generally considered to be one of the most
advanced and successful large computer systems ever developed. According
to Jim Ray, "SAGE was
one of the engineering marvels of the century. In fact if it looked better, it
might have been ranked with the Eiffel Tower, the Saturn Rocket or the Golden
Gate Bridge for engineering accomplishment. It also pioneered some of the most
of the important technology used to facilitate internet processing today: i.e.,
the modem, the mouse [light gun], multi-tasking, array processing, computer
learning, fault detection, magnetic memory, and interactive computer graphics.
Most important, it worked well enough for each center to coordinate about 100
operators , track 300 simultaneous flights, control numerous sorties against a
maneuvering radar-jamming 'enemy', and coordinate 'friendly' NIKE and Bomarc
defenses."
IBM built the SAGE hardware based on the Whirlwind computer design at MIT.
The software was written by The Rand Corporation and the System Development
Corporation (SDC) and employed about 20% of the world's programmers at the peak
of the project. When it was complete, the 250,000 lines of code was the most
complex piece of software in existence.
Each of the 27 SAGE installations had two separate computers, the second serving
as a "hot standby" in case the active computer failed. With this backup,
availability was an unprecedented 99.6%, when many other computers from that era
would fail every few hours. The computer weighed 300 tons and typically occupied
one floor of a huge windowless 4-story concrete blockhouse. On another floor,
dozens of Air Force operators watched their display screens and waited for signs
of enemy activity.
Some SAGE centers continued to operate until 1983, more than 20 years after its
technology was obsolete and its mission rendered militarily insignificant by the
ICBM. As a final irony, in the last years of its use, replacement vacuum
tubes had to be purchased from Soviet-bloc countries where they were still being
widely manufactured.
A
SAGE diagram showing the "Elements of the Air Defense Semi-Automatic Ground
Environment System": Interceptor fighter (F-106 shown); Long range radar; Texas
Tower; Gap Filler Radar; Picket Ship; Airborne Early Warning Radar; and Guided
Missiles. [June 27, 1958 Bendix Aviation Corporation]
|
Typical
SAGE site "cube" with four floors, air
conditioning and wiring on the ground, the computers on the second
floor, offices on the third and the combat center on top. A "big
screen" in the control room extends from the third to fourth floor. |
Magnetic
Cores were the basic technology for computer main memory from the 1950s into the
early 1970s. The tiny iron oxide cores could be magnetized clockwise or
counterclockwise to represent bits of information. Data could be retrieved in
millionths of a second. This array is from an
IBM-built SAGE computer from the 1950s. |
Air Defense diagram showing relationship of SAGE to national air defense system [1955] |
Typical
4-story SAGE Direction Center. 1st floor: Air cooling and ducting
equipment plus telephone frames, cables, and equipment to maintain communication
and radar data flow. Power house attaches to operations part of building by a
common wall. 2nd floor: The SAGE FSQ-7 duplex computers. 3rd floor:
Service area for the operation room above plus office and storage space, the
subsector command post, and the Kelvin-Hughes projector and air-situation
display screen. 4th floor: Operational areas where Air Force staff
supervised each major air defense function (weapons direction, identification,
air surveillance, etc.) from separate areas. |
SAGE, the F-106 and the MA-1 System [see History
of the F-106 page]
The F-106A Delta Dart operated in conjunction with the SAGE
(Semi-Automatic Ground Environment) network linked via the Hughes MA-1
fire-control system to the F-106. It operated by plotting the course needed to
intercept an enemy aircraft, automatically sighted the target, fired the
air-to-air missiles, and then automatically placed the F-106 on the correct
course to disengage. The F-106 could actually be computer-flown during
most of its mission, the pilot being needed only for takeoff, landing,
or in case something went wrong with the automation.
The primary means of communication between SAGE and the F-106 was
accomplished using Time Division Data Link (TDDL), intent being to provide non-verbal commands for vectoring the
aircraft towards a successful intercept. Signals from the SAGE AN/GKA-5
transmitter were received by the F-106 data link receiver; either an AN/ARR-60
or AN/ARR-61. SAGE provided two modes of control for interceptor command
and navigation: Close Control (CC) and Modified Close Control (MCC). The
SAGE transmission would dictate which of the two modes would be dominant in a
given scenario i.e. SAGE would dictate if the
intercept would be conducted under CC or MCC.
Close Control (CC) - The primary mode of the data link was Close
Control. In this mode the SAGE transmitter would send an encoded message
to the aircraft Data Link receiver which would check it for validity and proper
aircraft address before sending the information on to the
F-106 Delta Dart's MA-1
computer. The MA-1 computer would in turn use this information to send
commands for mach, altitude and heading to the Automatic Flight Control System (AFSC)
and cockpit displays for vectoring the interceptor towards the target.
While the AFSC could automatically accomplish the altitude and heading commands,
the pilot needed to manually adjust the throttle to achieve the command speed.
Modified Close Control (MCC) - When an F-106 was paired up with a
target, in addition to the altitude, speed and heading CC commands for the
interceptor, SAGE would also send MCC messages that contained extensive target
information. The Data Link receiver would validate the messages and pass
them on to the MA-1 computer. The MA-1 computer would use this information
to calculate the tactics required and send the corresponding speed, altitude and
heading commands to the cockpit displays and AFSC. Two types of MCC
messages were transmitted by SAGE: MCC-Region Origin (MCC TACAN) and MCC-Interceptor
(MCC-NO TACAN).
-
In MCC Region Origin, target X and Y
coordinates were referenced with respect to the SAGE origin
-
In MCC-Interceptor, target position
was referenced with respect to the interceptor.
The default mode was MCC-Region Origin.
MCC-Interceptor usually had to be requested by the pilot except when MCC
messages where sent as backup messages during the CC dominant mode.
In the Cockpit - TDDL interaction between SAGE and the F-106 was
controlled in the cockpit using the Data Link Converter Receiver Control Panel
located on the right console. The pilot could select a SAGE frequency
using one of 26 preset channels, or manually insert a four digit channel.
Using the Address Select switch, the pilot could select one of 32 aircraft
addresses that would be compared to the aircraft address embedded in the SAGE
signal as one of the means for validating the transmission. The receiver
also accommodated back-up data link voice communication.
The Display/Automatic Mode Selector Switch on the main instrument panel
determined what data link information was displayed and how intercept tactics
would be executed. There were two positions for the switch: MAX RANGE and
DL MIN TIME. Each had different meanings depending on which data link mode
was dominant (CC or MCC). For example if by SAGE command the dominant mode
was CC, then there was no difference between the MAX RANGE and DL MIN TIME
settings because SAGE was performing and issuing the interceptor guidance
calculations. However, if the dominant mode was MCC, the position of the
switch governed the profile and tactics commanded by the MA-1 computer to
approach and attack the target. Typical tactics included:
Cutoff
Pursuit
Stern Before Offset
Stern After Offset
Non-commit
The pilot could determine the selected tactic
by setting his Homing Point Selector Switch to “U” and monitoring the target
altitude marker on the AVVI. The marker would position at an altitude
corresponding to one of the above tactics for a period of time, and then revert
back to its normal function.
Additional TDDL displays in the cockpit included:
the positioning of target and
interceptor “bugs” on the Tactical Situation Display (TSD)
command airspeed and mach on the
Airspeed Mach Indicator (AMI)
command altitude and target altitude
on the Altitude Vertical Velocity Indicator (AVVI)
command bank and steering on the
Attitude Direction Indicator (ADI)
command heading and target course and
bearing on the Horizontal Situation Indicator (HSI)
time to offset and target range and
azimuth relative to interceptor on the radar scope
The proper functioning of the data link was
indicated by the Computer Mode Annunciator on the main instrument panel, which
could display either “DL” for current data link, “DR” for dead reckoning or a
barber pole if target information is over one minute old or no MCC data link was
received during attack. Once the pilot locked the radar onto the target, all
data link information was suspended while the MA-1 computer conducted the attack
and firing sequence. Upon completion of the attack and selection of AUTO NAV by
the pilot, data link information would resume for return to base vectoring.
SAGE System Facts
- Deployed: 1963 - 1983
- Computer Used: AN/FSQ-7
- Employed 55,000 vacuum tubes each
- Occupied 1/2 acre of floor space
- Weight: 275 tons per unit
- Electrical supply required: up to 3 megawatts
- Each system could support up to 150 terminals
- Total systems actually deployed: 22
- First use of magnetic memory - 64 Kb
- Total Cost: Approximately $61 Billion
SAGE Direction Centers (DC) and Control Center (CC) Locations[Click link to access site's page]
DC-1: McGuire AFB, NJ
DC-2: Stewart AFB, NY
DC-3 / CC-1: Hancock Field, NY
DC-4: Fort Lee AFS, VA
DC-5: Topsham AFS, ME (blockhouse demolished)
DC-6: Fort Custer, MI
DC-7 / CC-2: Truax Field, WI
DC-8: Richards-Gebaur AFB, MO
DC-9: Gunter AFB, AL
DC-10: Duluth IAP, MN
DC-11: Grand Forks AFB, ND
DC-12 / CC-3: McChord AFB, WA
DC-13: Adair AFS, OR
DC-14: K. I. Sawyer AFB, MI
DC-15: Larson AFB, WA
DC-16: Stead AFB, NV
DC-17: Norton AFB, CA
DC-18: Beale AFB, CA
DC-19 / CC-4*: Minot AFB, ND (* CC-4 blockhouse built, but AN/FSQ-8 never installed)
DC-20: Malmstrom AFB, MT
DC-21: Luke AFB, AZ
DC-22: Sioux City AFS, IA
SCC-5: Hamilton AFB, CA